B2C Solution Architect Cert Prep: Architecture and Integration
Study Up on Integration
In the wake of finishing this unit, you’ll have the option to:
Given a bunch of client prerequisites, suggest a proper plan and approach for a multi-cloud integration, understanding the out-of-the-container highlights, framework constraints, and when custom integration is required.
Given business necessities and use cases, suggest fitting integration designs dependent on information volume, inertness, and framework impediments.
Given a B2C use case, suggest highlights and approaches that guarantee security for the two clients and interior business clients while following territorial and neighborhood lawful prerequisites.
Comprehend the prescribed techniques on the most proficient method to incorporate frameworks to Salesforce Service, Commerce, and Marketing Cloud conditions utilizing APIs and conventions that help different integration configuration designs.
This unit sets you up for the Integration segment of the Salesforce B2C Solution Architect exam, which makes up 19% of the general exam. This segment of the exam tests these topics.
Integration charts and information stream between frameworks
Integration layers and contemplations
Information administration, information cutoff points, and information volumes
Nonconcurrent and simultaneous informing
Information volume and informing continuously and group integrations
Client verification contemplations utilizing SSO, 2FA, MFA, and two-way TLS
Salesforce stage API suggestions dependent on integration configuration designs
Like the past unit, this unit contains practice situation-based inquiries and flashcards.
A) What should you do to learn how to deliver a real-time connection between Salesforce and external systems?
B) What should you read to learn how to access Einstein Analytics lenses and datasets programmatically?
- What should you study to learn how to integrate data across Salesforce Service Cloud orgs and Commerce Cloud orgs?
- Which is the best solution to use when implementing the Remote Process Invocation—Request and Reply pattern?